MAS Says Dealing in Any Cryptocurrency is Hazardous

To clarify some questions and misconceptions surrounding the collapse of FTX.com, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has recently issued a statement. The Bahamas-based crypto exchange company filed for bankruptcy in the US on Nov 11, 2022 and is said to owe about US$3.1 billion (S$4.26 billion) to its top fifty creditors. Its short reign started last 2019.

In the statement released by MAS last Nov 21, MAS highlighted three key points.

#1: IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO PROTECT LOCAL USERS FROM FTX.COM

Since the company is not licensed under MAS and operates offshore, it is not possible to protect the local users who dealt with the bankruptcy of FTX.com. “MAS has consistently warned about the dangers of dealing with unregulated entities,” the central bank said.

#2: THERE WAS A CLEAR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BINANCE.COM AND FTX.COM

To the central bank, there was a clear difference between fellow crypto exchange companies Binance.com and FTX.com. While both companies are not licensed in Singapore, Binance.com was actively soliciting users in Singapore while FTX was not.

“Binance.com in fact went to the extent of offering listings in Singapore dollars and accepted Singapore-specific payment modes such as PayNow and PayLah,” according to the statement released by MAS. Thus, it was placed on the Investor Alert List (IAL).

#3: IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO LIST ALL CRYPTO EXCHANGES ON IAL

Hundreds of such exchanges and thousands of other entities offshore exist so, MAS says that it is not possible to create an exhaustive list of all offshore crypto exchanges in the world on the IAL. The purpose of the IAL is to “warn the public of entities that may be wrongly perceived as being MAS-regulated, especially those which solicit Singapore customers for financial business without the requisite MAS license.”

Image Credits: pixabay.com

Users looking to refer to all the MAS-regulated entities should refer to the Financial Institutions Directory. This directory keeps an exhaustive list of such entities. It is important to remember that crypto exchanges can and do fail.

“Even if a crypto exchange is licensed in Singapore, it would be currently only regulated to address money-laundering risks, not to protect investors,” says MAS.

Sources: 1 & 2

Read More...

Singapore Will Cease Issuing S$1,000 Notes Next Year

This month, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) announced that it plans to discontinue the issuance of the S$1,000 notes from January 1, 2021. A limited quantity of this note will be made available each month from now until December 2020.

How will this affect you? What are the implications of this decision?

#1: SAFETY MEASURE TO REDUCE THE MONEY LAUNDERING RISKS

According to MAS, this is a pre-emptive measure to mitigate the higher money laundering and terrorism financing risks associated with large denomination notes. Large denomination notes allow people to carry significant values of money anonymously. The anonymity attached to these notes can be used to facilitate money laundering and other illegal activities.

#2: ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ARE HIGHLY ENCOURAGED

To reduce your health and financial risks, it is best to use electronic payments whenever possible. MAS encouraged the use of electronic payments. Moreover, National University of Singapore’s Associate Professor and CGIO director Lawrence Loh highlighted that electronic payment systems are more secure than cash, despite the cyber-risks associated with online payments.

He said that: “You are able to secure two things with e-payments. Firstly, in terms of technical security, you can trace where your money is going, and secondly, you have physical security because you don’t have to carry large amounts of cash.”

#3: EXISTING S$1,000 NOTES IN CIRCULATION WILL REMAIN LEGAL TENDER

According to MAS, existing S$1,000 notes in circulation can still be used as a means of payment. They will continue to remain legal tender and can be used by the banks. To adapt to the upcoming demands of other denominations (particularly the S$100 note), MAS will make sufficient quantities of other denominations available.

#4: THE SELLING PRICE OF THE S$1,000 NOTE WILL LIKELY INCREASE

Currency collectors and dealers acknowledged that the selling price of the S$1,000 note will likely increase due to the limited supply of this note in the upcoming year. However, the currency dealers and collectors interviewed by TODAY have predicted that it will not increase dramatically.

You see, most people gravitate towards collecting notes of smaller denominations. For instance, a S$1,000 note from the orchid series (issued from 1967 to 1976) is worth around S$2,000. In contrast, a bundle of 1,000 S$1 notes from the same series is worth about S$12,000. It is amazing how these items have a S$10,000 difference in its selling prices!

#5: THIS MOVE IS ALIGNED WITH INTERNATIONAL NORMS

Renowned economists, including those from the International Monetary Fund, have advocated the phasing out of notes with large denominations to deter financial crimes such as corruption and tax evasion. This move by MAS is aligned with the international norms. For instance, European authorities stopped the printing of the 500-euro banknote last year.

Sources: 1, 2, & 3

Read More...